Why “Projected Returns” Matter Less Than Structure

Projected returns are often the first number investors see and the last number sophisticated investors trust. In private real estate, projections are inherently uncertain. They rely on assumptions about time, cost, market conditions, and execution that cannot be fully controlled. Structure, by contrast, governs how risk and reward are actually distributed when reality deviates from plan. Experienced investors understand that while projections may inform expectations, structure determines outcomes. Over time, structure matters far more than any projected return figure.

Projections Are Hypotheses, Not Outcomes

Projected returns are best understood as hypotheses built on assumptions. They reflect what could happen under a specific set of conditions rather than what will happen. Sophisticated investors treat projections as scenarios to be tested rather than promises to be believed. When projections are viewed as outcomes rather than models, risk increases. Structure exists to manage the inevitable gap between projection and reality.

In private deals, structure defines the order in which capital absorbs stress. Capital stack position, preferred returns, and distribution waterfalls determine whether losses are borne by equity, mezzanine layers, or sponsors. Sophisticated investors focus on these mechanics because they govern downside behavior. A modest projected return with strong structural protection often proves superior to a higher projection with weak downside alignment.

Projected upside is meaningless if downside is not controlled. Deals that promise attractive returns but expose capital to early loss lack resilience. Sophisticated investors evaluate whether projected returns compensate for actual risk rather than simply exceeding benchmarks. Structure ensures that upside is earned without requiring capital to absorb disproportionate downside.

Projections Change; Structure Persists

Market conditions, interest rates, and timelines change throughout a deal’s life. Projections are revised as assumptions evolve. Structure, however, remains largely fixed. This permanence is why experienced investors place greater weight on structural integrity. When conditions shift, structure dictates how the investment responds. Strong structure allows adaptation without impairment. Weak structure amplifies stress.

Even conservative projections cannot compensate for poor structure. A deal may appear prudent on paper but expose investors to misaligned incentives, excessive leverage, or unfavorable capital stack positioning. Sophisticated investors examine whether structure supports capital protection independently of projections. Structure must stand on its own merits, not rely on optimistic modeling.

Structure influences how sponsors behave under pressure. Compensation frameworks, promote structures, and capital position affect decision-making. Sophisticated investors understand that incentives drive actions. Structure that aligns sponsor success with investor outcomes reduces risk. Weak alignment can encourage behavior that prioritizes optics or activity over preservation.

Risk Is Experienced Through Structure

Risk does not materialize as a number on a spreadsheet. It manifests through cash flow shortfalls, covenant breaches, delays, and capital calls. Structure governs how these events impact investors. Sophisticated investors assess how risk travels through the structure rather than how it appears in projections. Understanding this flow is critical to evaluating real exposure.

Time is one of the most common sources of deviation from projections. Extended timelines affect financing costs, market exposure, and opportunity cost. Structure that tolerates time through flexible debt and adequate reserves protects capital. Projections that assume perfect timing offer little protection when delays occur. Experienced investors prioritize structures that remain viable even when time expands.

Strong structure preserves optionality. It allows investors to extend holds, adjust strategy, or pursue alternative exits without distress. Optionality is rarely captured in projected returns but is invaluable in practice. Sophisticated investors value this flexibility because it reduces forced decisions and preserves capital.

Assemble Capital’s Perspective on Structure

Assemble Capital evaluates opportunities through a structural lens first. Projected returns are reviewed, but emphasis is placed on how the deal is constructed, how risk is allocated, and how incentives are aligned. The objective is to create investments that remain durable across varying conditions rather than optimizing for ideal scenarios. Structure is viewed as the foundation of long-term performance.

Projected returns often convey a false sense of precision. Decimal points suggest certainty that does not exist. Sophisticated investors are wary of this illusion. They understand that precision in projections does not equate to accuracy in outcomes. Structure provides protection against this uncertainty by governing behavior when assumptions prove incorrect.

Rather than asking what the projected return is, experienced investors ask how the deal behaves under stress. They examine who absorbs losses first, how cash flow is distributed, and what happens if timelines extend. These questions reveal more about risk than any projected IRR. Structure answers these questions directly.

Long-Term Outcomes Reflect Structure, Not Models

Over full market cycles, performance is shaped by how investments withstand adverse conditions. Deals with strong structure tend to survive and recover, while those with weak structure often fail regardless of initial projections. Sophisticated investors focus on this long-term pattern rather than short-term expectations.

Projected returns are effective at attracting attention and capital. Structure is what retains capital through volatility. Investors who prioritize structure experience fewer forced outcomes and greater consistency. This retention is critical to long-term participation in private markets.

Assessing structure requires deeper analysis than reviewing projections. It involves understanding legal documents, capital stacks, and incentive frameworks. Sophisticated investors invest the time to perform this analysis because they recognize its importance. Convenience often leads to reliance on projections, but discipline leads to focus on structure.

Structure Reduces Dependence on Forecasts

Forecasts are inherently uncertain. Strong structure reduces dependence on accurate forecasts by building tolerance for error. Sophisticated investors prefer deals that remain viable even when forecasts are wrong. This resilience is more valuable than optimistic projections that require precision to succeed.

Choosing structure over projected returns reflects a preference for stability over optimism. Sophisticated investors accept that upside may be moderated in exchange for durability. This tradeoff supports long-term capital preservation and compounding.

In private real estate, structure governs reality. Projected returns describe possibility, but structure determines consequence. Investors who understand this distinction allocate capital more wisely and experience fewer severe losses. Over time, structure proves to be the most reliable predictor of outcome.

Investing With Structural Awareness

Investing with structural awareness requires patience and discipline. It means asking harder questions and accepting less exciting narratives. Sophisticated investors embrace this approach because it aligns with long-term objectives rather than short-term attraction.

Understanding structure is a form of risk intelligence. It allows investors to see beyond surface-level projections and evaluate how deals will behave when conditions change. This intelligence separates durable investors from those reliant on favorable scenarios.

Structure rarely draws attention, but it quietly shapes outcomes. Investors who prioritize structure often appear conservative, yet they tend to endure. In private markets, endurance is the ultimate advantage.

Previous
Previous

Capital Preservation as a Growth Strategy

Next
Next

Understanding Downside Protection in Private Deals