Assemble
Capital

Strategies · Underwriting Discipline

Complexity is
the margin.

We acquire where zoning, entitlement, vacancy, or exit complexity thins the buyer pool — and where a specialized local operator can convert that complexity into value.

Investment Thesis

The best deals are too big for local flippers and too small for the big funds.

That's the space we live in. Land is scarce, permits are hard, new supply is thin, and buyer demand never quits in the neighborhoods we work — so the operator who can handle the complexity captures the value.

Before we buy anything, we map out several ways to exit — a straight sale, selling homes or units individually, selling the building whole, or refinancing and holding. The plan is set before closing, not improvised after.

Completed luxury residence, Mulholland Drive

01 · SFR–Redev

Luxury Residential Development

Studs-out rebuilds and heavy remodels of under-improved homes in prime submarkets — the strategy behind three neighborhood-record sales in the Hollywood Hills.

Acquisition basis
$2M – $6M
Exit range
$3M – $9M
Business plan
12 – 30 months
Target gross margin on cost
~30 – 60%
Ground-up multifamily, Calvert Street

02 · MF–Dev

Opportunistic & Value Add Multifamily Development

Ground-up 4–20-unit multifamily projects, sold stabilized or refinanced into term debt and held — three delivered builds are currently held as 100%-occupied rentals.

Program
4 – 20 units
Build duration
12 – 30 months
Refinance discipline
DSCR ≥ ~1.20 – 1.25x
Sale vs. hold
Decided by market at stabilization
Rendering of 4058 Harter — SB 684 small-lot subdivision, Culver City

03 · SB–684

SB 684/1123 Fee Simple Subdivisions

Among the first developers executing SB 684 and SB 1123 ministerial small-lot subdivisions in the region — delivering fee-simple homes on individual APNs with conventional buyer financing.

Program
4 – 10 homes
End-user pricing
$1M – $1.5M
Entitlement
Ministerial — months, not years
Fallback
Bulk-sale value underwritten
Ground-up triplex sold as TIC units, David Avenue

04 · TIC

Tenancy-In-Common Housing

Small multifamily sold as tenancy-in-common units at a pricing premium to bulk value — the model executed at 5832 David Ave and now applied at 1925 19th St.

Program
3 – 4 units
Sellout window
18 – 30 months
Support required
Resale-comp depth & buyer financing
Fallback
Bulk-sale value underwritten

Figures are underwriting targets, not promises or guarantees. Key risks per strategy — construction cost, absorption, entitlement, financing, and valuation — are addressed in each investment's definitive offering documents.

How You Invest

The investment model,
step by step.

Every project is its own LLC. You invest as a Class A member alongside our own money, you're paid first, and you share in the profits when the project sells.

Step 1

You invest

Your investment buys Class A membership in a single project's LLC — one property, one business plan, one set of documents. The partners invest in the same deal, in every deal.

Step 2

We build

Our team handles everything from purchase through construction to sale, on a 12–36 month plan, with regular updates and reporting through the investor portal along the way.

Step 3

You're paid first

When the project sells, the construction loan and closing costs are paid off — then investors receive a preferred return (historically 8%) and their capital back before the sponsor takes a dollar of profit.

Step 4

Profits are shared

Whatever remains is split between Class A (investors) and Class B (sponsor) through the waterfall. The Class A share is set deal by deal and spelled out in each offering.

Example · A $100,000 Investment

You invest (Class A)
$100,000
Project completes & sells
~12–36 months
Preferred return paid first
8% — $8,000
Your capital returned
$100,000
Your share of remaining profit
Class A % — set per deal

Illustrative only — not a projection or a guarantee. The preferred return is a distribution priority, not a promised payment; if a project loses money, investors can lose capital. Exact terms, timing, and the Class A split are governed by each project's operating agreement and offering documents.

Acquisition Criteria

Our buy box.

If a deal doesn't fit the box, we don't buy it. These are underwriting targets — final numbers are set per investment.

GeographyLA infill — Westside, Santa Monica, Culver City, select ValleyTotal capitalization$2M – $12M per project
Equity check$300K – $2.5MProject duration12 – 36 months
Target gross margin on cost~30 – 60%Unit count1 – 14 units
Entitlement certaintyBy-right or ministerial preferredViable exits2+ underwritten pathways
Comparable supportMultiple relevant resale compsDependence on appreciationNone — underwrite to today's comps
Downside protectionPositive capital-preservation case requiredSponsor co-investmentGP invests in every deal

Process

Fifteen steps between a listing and a closing.

Every acquisition passes a three-principal investment committee, in sequence:

Steps 1–3

Source & screen

Deal sourcing through the brokerage network and off-market channels; zoning and entitlement screen; residual land analysis.

Steps 4–6

Price the plan

Comparable-sale and absorption review; preliminary construction pricing; concept design and yield study.

Steps 7–9

Prove the downside

Environmental, tenant, title, and legal diligence; debt-market testing; base, downside, and severe-downside underwriting.

Steps 10–12

Commit

Investment committee review by all three principals; final capital structure; closing approval.

Steps 13–15

Monitor & exit

Post-closing business-plan monitoring; monthly budget-to-actual variance review; exit-readiness review.

Rejection Criteria

Reasons we walk.

Any one is enough
  • Insufficient margin or unsupported resale pricing
  • Inadequate comparable depth
  • Excessive entitlement risk
  • Unresolved tenant or affordable-housing exposure
  • Inadequate interest reserve or contingency
  • Unfinanceable construction plan
  • Dependence on a single speculative exit
  • Negative downside outcome
  • Excessive construction cost per square foot
  • Unacceptable loan-maturity risk
  • Reliance on future capital without a committed source
  • Insufficient liquidity to complete

Controls

The risk-management framework.

Basis & Underwriting

Acquisition-basis discipline, required downside cases, comparable-sale depth, absorption sensitivity, maximum-leverage limits, minimum-liquidity policy.

Construction

Budget verification, contingency requirements, change-order approval, draw controls, lender inspections, monthly budget-to-actual.

Financing

Interest reserves sized through plan, maturity tracking and extension planning, refinancing-risk review, interest-rate sensitivity.

Entitlement & Legal

Ministerial pathways preferred, affordable-housing obligations tracked, tenant and environmental diligence, insurance requirements.

Portfolio & Governance

Concentration awareness, related-party disclosure, capital-call procedures, valuation policy with dated sources, investor reporting standards.

Key Person & Force Majeure

Three-principal structure, contractor default remedies, completion-guaranty exposure managed, material-litigation disclosure policy.

Proof

The discipline shows up in the numbers.