Assemble
Capital

Strategy 01 · SB–684 / SB–1123 · Core Strategy

SB 684/1123 Fee Simple
Subdivisions

One of our two core strategies, and an opportunistic one. Ministerial small-lot subdivisions under SB 684 and SB 1123 — new fee-simple homes on individual APNs, and the focus of the Assemble Capital pipeline.

4 – 10
Homes per project
$1M – $1.5M
End-user pricing
~12 months
Entitlement start to ready-to-issue (RTI) permits, trending toward 9–10
~12 months
Ready-to-issue permits to completed homes
Fee-simple
Each home sold individually on its own parcel — no condo map or DRE public report

Underwriting targets, not promises or guarantees. Individual investments may vary; final parameters are governed by each investment's definitive documents. Timelines are estimates. Because each home is a fee-simple lot with its own APN in a standard subdivision, not a condominium or common-interest development, and is sold as a completed home within an incorporated city, no DRE public report is required (Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code §11010.4; how the exemption works).

The Reasoning

A change in state law turned a multi-year political process into an administrative one. That is the whole opportunity.

SB 684, expanded by SB 1123, created a ministerial approval pathway for small-lot subdivisions on multifamily-zoned land. Ministerial matters enormously: it means approval is administrative rather than discretionary — no public hearing, no discretionary environmental review, no neighbor appeal that can add three years and kill a project outright. Entitlement stops being a political risk and becomes a schedule item.

The arbitrage this opens is a valuation mismatch. Multifamily-zoned land is priced on the income approach — what a rental building on that site would earn. SB 684 lets the same site deliver individual homes sold to individual buyers at for-sale pricing, which on a per-square-foot basis is materially higher than income-based value. We are buying land at one valuation basis and exiting it at another.

The fee-simple structure is what makes the exit work. Each home sits on its own legal lot with its own APN, so buyers use conventional mortgage financing rather than the specialized loans a TIC or condo-alternative structure requires. That widens the buyer pool to essentially every qualified homebuyer in the price band — a decisive advantage over structures that ask buyers to accept unfamiliar financing.

Being early is a real and temporary edge. Few operators in the region have executed this pathway; The Culver VI at 3850 Westwood was the first ministerial (tentative tract map) approval in Culver City. While the field is thin, sites can still be acquired at bases set by the old rental-value assumption. That window narrows as the statute becomes better understood.

How It Looks

One Lot.
Several Homes.

A single dated house on a multifamily-zoned infill lot becomes several new homes, each on its own legal parcel with its own APN, sold individually with conventional mortgages and no HOA.

STREET1 houseGARAGE1 APN
BeforeOne house on one lot, priced as land
STREETAPN 1APN 2APN 3APN 4APN 5APN 6SHARED WALK
After SB 684Six fee-simple homes, six APNs, one parking space each

Illustrative layout based on a 5,400 SF Culver City lot; actual plans vary by site

Traditional subdivision

  • Discretionary public hearings
  • CEQA environmental review
  • Neighborhood and political opposition
  • Two to four years to entitle
  • Often a condo map, HOA and DRE public report

The SB 684 path

  • Ministerial, by-right approval
  • No hearings and no CEQA review
  • Objective standards, statutory review clocks
  • About 12 months to ready-to-issue permits, trending toward 9–10
  • Fee-simple homes on individual APNs — no HOA, no condo map, no DRE public report

How It Works

Four Things This Strategy Depends On.

Regulatory

Ministerial, Not Discretionary

Under the Starter Home Revitalization Act — Senate Bill 684 and Senate Bill 1123 — there is no hearing, no discretionary review and no appeal: entitlement becomes a timeline rather than a political outcome.

Arbitrage

Buy on Income Value, Sell on For-Sale Value

Land priced as rental product, exited as individual homes at for-sale pricing.

Financing

Fee-Simple Widens the Buyer Pool

Individual APNs mean conventional mortgages, not specialized fractional lending.

Absorption

Sell Home by Home

Each fee-simple home is sold individually to an owner-occupant, released as the market absorbs. With no condo map, HOA or DRE public report, homes can be listed as soon as they’re complete.

New to these statutes? Read our guide to what SB 684 and SB 1123 allow — eligibility, lot sizes, setbacks, and how the Starter Home Revitalization Act compares to SB 9.

New for 2027 · SB 1116 & AB 1751

More Sites.
Larger Projects.

Two laws signed in September 2026 widen the ministerial path to fee-simple housing. Both apply from January 1, 2027.

SB 1116

A Stronger Starter Home Act

Amends SB 684 and SB 1123. A simpler site-eligibility test, lots as small as 480 sq ft through averaging, a 1.25 floor-area floor, height measured in feet rather than stories, capped setbacks and parking, and private CC&Rs that can no longer block a qualifying project. The ten-home cap stays. What changes →

AB 1751

Missing Middle Townhomes

A new ministerial, CEQA-exempt path for for-sale townhome projects of up to 150 homes, three stories or fewer, on fee-simple lots as small as 600 sq ft with no required HOA. It picks up where SB 684’s ten-home cap stops. How it works →

SB 684 remains our core strategy. As AB 1751 takes effect, part of our syndication model will be facilitating AB 1751 townhome projects where a site qualifies: larger multifamily-zoned sites, structured the same way as our SB 684 work, with fee-simple lots and homes sold individually to owner-occupants. The aim is the same: more fee-simple, for-sale housing in Los Angeles on a predictable entitlement path.

Both laws are new and cities have not yet published implementation procedures. Eligibility depends on each site; any project is underwritten individually, and any offering is made only through definitive offering documents.

Case Studies · Construction Financing

Entitlement Creates
the Equity.

On an SB 684 project the approval itself creates value. On both SB 684 projects our team has taken to construction financing, the appraisals cleared lenders’ loan-to-value and loan-to-after-repair-value requirements with room to spare, and each refinance closed with no cash required at closing.

A typical SB 684 project timeline (months, estimated)

EntitlementRange / varies by projectConstructionMilestone
Purchase basisOne dated house, priced as land
Entitled valueApproved lots, appraised as-is
As-complete valueThe finished homes

Illustrative, not to scale · no project figures shown

Lenders size the construction loan against what the approval created, not what we paid. Because the entitled and as-complete appraisals sit well above the purchase basis, the refinance can fund the build without a significant new equity injection.

That is the step that has closed with no cash to close on both SB 684 projects our team has taken to construction financing, shown below.

Rendering of 1949 17th St, Santa Monica — nine fee-simple homes under SB 684

Santa Monica · Principal-owned

1949 17th St

  • Tentative tract map approved for nine fee-simple homes on one subdivided lot.
  • Only the second SB 684 approval in Santa Monica, about eight months from entitlement start to tentative tract map approval.
  • About to receive ready-to-issue (RTI) building permits, with construction expected to start in November 2026 (est.).
  • The appraisal on entitlement came in well above the purchase price, and the refinance into a construction loan closed with no cash to close.

A Thornton Development Group project owned by the principals, shown as their track record. It is not an Assemble Capital offering and did not involve Assemble Capital investors.

Rendering of The Culver VI, 3850 Westwood, Culver City — the first SB 684 approval in Culver City

Culver City · Assemble Capital

Our First SB 684 Project

  • The first SB 684 tentative tract map approval in Culver City.
  • Six developable lots appraised as entitled land, well above the purchase basis.
  • About three months from ready-to-issue (RTI) building permits, with construction expected to start in January 2027 (est.).
  • The refinance into a construction loan closed with no cash to close.

An active Assemble Capital project and private offering. Project financials, including appraisals and loan terms, are shared privately with qualified investors.

Why We’re Concentrating Here

No SB 684 project, ours or the principals’, has completed a full cycle through sale yet. What we have seen so far is consistent: appraisals that support construction financing without significant new equity, lenders comfortable with the pathway, and homes priced at the entry level of the fee-simple market, where the buyer pool is deepest. Timelines are improving too: our projects are taking about 12 months from entitlement start to ready-to-issue permits, and we are seeing room to tighten that to 9–10 months as building departments gain experience with a law adopted only in the last few years. Our underwriting supports a meaningful margin even when we model conservative home prices.

That is why SB 684 is where we are concentrating the company. To review the underwriting, appraisals and financing behind a specific project, request a conversation →

Appraisals are opinions of value as of their effective date, not sale prices, and future appraisals and loan terms may differ. Underwriting outcomes are projections based on assumptions that may not be realized; actual results may differ materially, including loss of capital. Nothing here is an offer to sell or a solicitation to buy any security; any offering is made only through definitive offering documents to eligible investors.

SB 684 / SB 1123 Site Criteria

What Makes an
SB 684 Site Work.

These are infill lots in the flats, usually with a dated single-family home on them, big enough for at least six new fee-simple homes. We prefer multifamily-zoned parcels on the Westside, in Class A, A− and B+ neighborhoods, and every site has to clear the tenant-history and hazard rules in the law. Agents and owners can send us a site that fits.

  • Location: infill lots in the flats. Westside markets first, in Class A / A− / B+ neighborhoods: Culver City, Mar Vista, Palms, West Los Angeles, Sawtelle, Del Rey, Santa Monica, Venice and Marina del Rey (outside the Coastal Zone), Beverly Grove, the Fairfax District, Westchester and Brentwood. We also buy infill sites in the South Bay, San Diego County, Orange County and Santa Barbara County, outside the Coastal Zone, where the new homes can conservatively achieve strong per-square-foot resale. See every target neighborhood.
  • Lot size: 5,000 SF minimum, 6,000 SF or more preferred. The bigger the lot, the better. The site needs to fit at least six fee-simple single-family homes, each with at least one parking space.
  • Lot shape: corner and street-to-alley lots preferred. Two street frontages make for a better site plan and access. We still consider mid-block lots.
  • Price: scales with the number of homes. For a six-home site we typically pay $800,000 – $1,500,000; for eight homes, $1,500,000 – $2,200,000; for ten homes, $2,000,000 – $3,000,000. The stronger the neighborhood and the resale value of each home, the more we can pay, so higher prices are possible in top neighborhoods.
  • Existing home: owner-occupied, or no recent renters. An owner-occupied single-family home, or a single-family home with no rental history in the last 5 years.
  • No Ellis Act filings on the property in the last 15 years.
  • Not in a high or very high fire hazard severity zone. This rules out most hillside lots.
  • Clear of the law’s other site exclusions: earthquake fault zones, special flood hazard areas and floodways, wetlands, protected habitat, hazardous waste sites and conservation easements.
  • Zoning: multifamily preferred. Multifamily-zoned lots (up to 5 acres) have the clearest path to qualify under SB 684. Single-family-zoned lots (up to 1.5 acres) qualify under SB 1123 only if the lot is vacant, which can include a lot whose only structure is abandoned and uninhabitable; they also need room for at least six homes.
  • Not already split under SB 9 or SB 684.

A screening summary, not legal advice. Final eligibility depends on the local agency’s review of the specific site.

The pathway was proven at 1949 17th St, a principal-owned project: ministerial approval, fee-simple homes on individual APNs, conventional buyer financing, and a unit-release sellout. No Assemble Capital SB 684 project has completed a sellout yet. The first, in Culver City, has refinanced into its construction loan, is about three months from ready-to-issue permits, and is expected to start construction in January 2027 (est.); Harter and Helms are in entitlement; and a fourth, The Sentney VI, is in acquisition. The Sentney VI images are conceptual renderings.

What Can Go Wrong

The Risks We Underwrite Against.

Every strategy has a failure mode. These are the ones specific to this one — the complete risk disclosure for any investment lives in its offering documents.

  • SB 684 is a recent statute and jurisdictions interpret and administer it differently. Processing timelines, plan-check standards, and local implementation vary, and the law itself could be amended.
  • Affordable-housing obligations apply on these projects and are disclosed per deal.
  • Sellout is absorption-dependent: each home waits on its own buyer and financing, so selling every home individually may take longer than modeled. Pricing at the entry level of the fee-simple market, where the buyer pool is deepest, is how we manage that risk.
  • Three of the active projects carry construction cost above current loan commitments; each requires a construction refinancing, and investor-level return projections are intentionally withheld until that capitalization is reconciled.

Investor Relationships

Start With a Conversation.

We get to know investors before any specific project is discussed. Projects in this strategy are held in project-specific LLCs, with the principals personally guaranteeing the project loans, never our investors. Nothing here is an offer to sell or a solicitation to buy any security.

Contacting us is not an offer, commitment, or investment. Any offering is made only through definitive offering documents to eligible investors with whom we have a pre-existing relationship.